Washington Evening Journal
111 North Marion Avenue
Washington, IA 52353
319-653-2191
Slashing property taxes at the community's expense
By Jake Tornholm, Williamsburg City Councilman
Mar. 31, 2025 3:08 pm
Southeast Iowa Union offers audio versions of articles using Instaread. Some words may be mispronounced.
The latest proposal under Senate Study Bill 1208 is a textbook example of political shortsightedness masquerading as fiscal responsibility.
At first glance, reducing property tax rates might sound like a gift to taxpayers, but for cities like Williamsburg, this "gift" is more like a Trojan horse — promising relief while delivering devastation to essential community services.
The new formula under consideration, besides being wildly complicated and difficult for taxpayers to understand, would drive the General Fund Tax Levy Rate down in Williamsburg to approximately $5.10 per $1,000 of assessed value.
For Williamsburg, with a prior year's tax revenue of $1,539,765 and a total assessed value of $307,744,539, this reduction could have catastrophic consequences. Simply put, the math doesn't lie: there will be less money to pay for the fundamental services that keep our communities safe and functional.
The most immediate casualties? Public safety and infrastructure. With the cost of insurance and utilities steadily climbing, Williamsburg is already walking a fiscal tightrope to balance its budget.
This drastic cut would make it virtually impossible to maintain current staffing levels in the police department or continue with swimming pool operations during the summer months.
Residents clamoring for lower taxes must ask themselves. is saving a few dollars worth risking slower emergency response times or fewer officers patrolling our streets? If the city can no longer sustain the police force, who will step in to keep our neighborhoods safe?
Moreover, this bill does not account for the growing financial burden that small and mid-sized municipalities face. Unlike large metropolitan areas with diverse revenue streams, towns like Williamsburg rely heavily on property taxes to fund essential services.
SSB1208's shortsighted approach disregards these realities, leaving local governments with the impossible choice of cutting vital services or plunging into financial instability.
Proponents of the bill argue that taxpayers are being crushed under rising property valuations and that relief is long overdue. But let's be honest: this proposal is not about helping working families. It is a political maneuver to score points by slashing taxes without acknowledging the real-world fallout.
Politicians pushing this bill are gambling with the safety and well-being of our communities while sidestepping the consequences of their actions.
The real problem with property taxes is that income is not keeping up with home valuations. As property values soar, household earnings remain stagnant, and the increasing costs of utilities and insurance compound the strain on working families.
True relief will only come from addressing these underlying economic disparities rather than implementing superficial tax cuts that jeopardize essential services.
It's time for residents to demand better. Fiscal responsibility should not mean sabotaging public safety and community welfare.
Our leaders must reject SSB1208 in its current form and find a balanced approach that protects both taxpayers and the essential services that define the quality of life in Williamsburg.
The stakes are too high to gamble with the future of our community. We need solutions that prioritize both affordability and the public good — not reckless cuts that leave us vulnerable and unprepared.